<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Improving Manageability with OS Streaming White Paper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ipip.intel.com/go/1861/improving-manageability-with-os-streaming-in-training-rooms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ipip.intel.com/go/1861/improving-manageability-with-os-streaming-in-training-rooms/</link>
	<description>Sharing best practices and technology with the IT community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:03:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Catherine Spence</title>
		<link>http://ipip.intel.com/go/1861/improving-manageability-with-os-streaming-in-training-rooms/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine Spence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipip.intel.com/go/?p=1861#comment-320</guid>
		<description>Hi Ron!  Thanks for your question.  The scripting discussed in the paper was a convenient way for us to kick off a massive reboot of all of our training room PCs.  If everybody reboots at the same time, it is a worst case scenario on the end-to-end solution.  We wanted to see what effect it would have on network bandwidth and the load on the server.  The value of scripting was that it enabled us to capture additional data (like timestamps) and allowed us to reproduce the scenario consistently (check results of multiple runs for data quality.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ron!  Thanks for your question.  The scripting discussed in the paper was a convenient way for us to kick off a massive reboot of all of our training room PCs.  If everybody reboots at the same time, it is a worst case scenario on the end-to-end solution.  We wanted to see what effect it would have on network bandwidth and the load on the server.  The value of scripting was that it enabled us to capture additional data (like timestamps) and allowed us to reproduce the scenario consistently (check results of multiple runs for data quality.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Main</title>
		<link>http://ipip.intel.com/go/1861/improving-manageability-with-os-streaming-in-training-rooms/comment-page-1/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Main</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipip.intel.com/go/?p=1861#comment-318</guid>
		<description>My company Questeq has been working with OS streaming for over 5 years. We were instrmental in the product development of Ardence ( BXP) to add disk side caching. We went down the road of no hard drives - we found that using the hard drive as a caching devices for the OS was much more efficent in our labs. - we had over 100 school district using the technology before the Citrix purchase.
In your article you only mention scripting as the tool to create the streams - was there a reason  or did I miss something?
(Define, Measure,Analyze,Improve and Control!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My company Questeq has been working with OS streaming for over 5 years. We were instrmental in the product development of Ardence ( BXP) to add disk side caching. We went down the road of no hard drives &#8211; we found that using the hard drive as a caching devices for the OS was much more efficent in our labs. &#8211; we had over 100 school district using the technology before the Citrix purchase.<br />
In your article you only mention scripting as the tool to create the streams &#8211; was there a reason  or did I miss something?<br />
(Define, Measure,Analyze,Improve and Control!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
